Guys,
There’s quite a discussion going on at SoCalGamesDay’s message board that I think is very topical for us as game designers. It developed out of the response to Seth’s inquiry about playtesting prototypes at the SoCalGamesDay event and concerns what is appropriate as a theme for a game. (Someone asked about playtesting a game called “The Pimp Game”.)
Go to http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/SoCal-GamesDay/. If you tag any message, then click on “Message Index”, then “Previous” you’ll get a list of all the most recent messages. Look for the ones with the subject “Re: Prototypes”.
I’d be very interested in our community’s thoughts on this issue.
Leland
FL,
Your response to this issue was well put, so much so that I just had to quote you in my last post at SoCalGamesDay. (I hope you don’t mind.)
BTW: I guess I should have added this topic to the thread Seth mentioned. Feel free to move if you like.
Here are excerpts from my last post at SoCalGamesDay:
Eric, try not to take it personally that so many of us just do not appreciate the theme you chose for your game at all. But there are reasons for that. (And you can always re-theme a well designed game.) It is to your credit that you would not bring this game to GamesDay to test-play.
I’ve worked with youth groups in the past, and sometimes it was a constant battle to discourage the young men from routinely referring to their female peers as “da hos”. If our youth can’t see how obviously misogynistic that is, then the adults of our society have fallen short.
Next (as if enough of a raucous hasn’t already been raised) we’ll have to talk about how themes of violence, such as warfare and such, fit into this discussion. My personal take is that anything too explicit or gratuitous is not ideal, especially if it is directed toward children. (I don’t like the theme of “Lunch Money” for that reason.)
War games are a somewhat different case. I’m usually OK with those if they don’t try to glorify all the gore. Consider that philosophers going back to Augustine of Hippo and before have posited situations when a war might be righteous. But I can’t think of any philosophers who’ve suggested that brutalizing and sexually exploiting young women is justified (or even morally benign) under any circumstances. Although, regrettably, there probably are some moral relativist who would. (But I am NOT suggesting that anyone who is amused by the game-theme of pimping actually feels that such behavior would be alright in real life.)
Anyway, I wasn’t really trying to resurrect this issue. It just came up at GamesDay.
Leland