How should I handle it if an artist goes badly off-specification with a piece of artwork?
Even if they are given corrections, and manage to go completely off-spec on those too?
This seems like it's time to reject it outright. Seems like if an artist submits art that doesn't meet the specifications, then you shouldn't pay for it because they haven't given you what you asked for.
(I'm aware that there can be communication problems that cause this and that should be investigated too, specifications might potentially be unclear or misleading, but I'm specifically talking about when specs were clear)
Even if they are given corrections, and manage to go completely off-spec on those too?
This seems like it's time to reject it outright. Seems like if an artist submits art that doesn't meet the specifications, then you shouldn't pay for it because they haven't given you what you asked for.
(I'm aware that there can be communication problems that cause this and that should be investigated too, specifications might potentially be unclear or misleading, but I'm specifically talking about when specs were clear)
If there are communication problems at that level, you'll be in for some really difficult times if you stay with him.
The choice, at least to me, seems very clear.
If it's a new artist and everything has this problem, then it seems like yes they're not a good choice to work with.
But if it's someone you've worked with for a while, for example, and normally there aren't any problems then the situation is different. It's more of an anomaly than an artist that is plain bad at communication. I don't think it's reasonable to cut an artist loose for one bad instance like I described.
On the other hand, they might not want to keep working for you if you refuse payment for something like this, so it might be time for the working relationship to end anyway.