I need blank cards for testing, preferably very cheap ones... what are my options?
Cheap blank cards for playtesting
You can try the protoparts link on the left for the BGDF store. They sell some very nice standard sized (2.5x3.5") cards with rounded corners on 6-up inkjet printable sheets. It's $9 for 150 cards.
If you want cheaper, you can use printable business cards. They're available in any office supply store, and they're 2x3.5".
Jason
If they are just for testing, I prefer to print on thicker cardstock and then round the corners with a punch I picked up for $6.50 at a local arts and crafts store. It is amazing how much more eager the playtesters are if the cards shuffle and handle well. By printing on cardstock your costs are very low and if you need to scrap that version you haven't lost much.
rob
I usually use Magic cards in sleeves with paper inserts. This gives you a great feel (and the sleeves extend the mock-up's lifespan considerably). Even if you don't play Magic you can usually pick up as many commons as you need after any sealed deck or draft tournament.
Chad
Definitely paper inserts in card sleeves is the way to go (whether or not you put in a playing card to stiffen the sleeve). I have done a game with more than 150 cards and more than a dozen iterations. Changes are fast and easy when you use paper (and MUCH cheaper than cardstock). The sleeves help give them a more professional feel (much better than using plain cardstock without the sleeves).
That reminds me, I went to my local gaming store to get the stiff clear sleeves that I used to use with my Magic The Gathering cards back in the day, and I can't seem to find them. Do they still exist? I was forced to buy the 'normal' clear plastic sleeves last time I went, but I'd rather use the stiff ones. I know they are more expensive, but I think you get a better feel with the stiff sleeves. Plus you don't need to add any 'stiffening' material such as card stock or a 'real' playing card as the stiffness is in the sleeve itself. Does any have a source for these stiff sleeves?
-Darke
That reminds me, I went to my local gaming store to get the stiff clear sleeves that I used to use with my Magic The Gathering cards back in the day, and I can't seem to find them. Do they still exist? I was forced to buy the 'normal' clear plastic sleeves last time I went, but I'd rather use the stiff ones. I know they are more expensive, but I think you get a better feel with the stiff sleeves. Plus you don't need to add any 'stiffening' material such as card stock or a 'real' playing card as the stiffness is in the sleeve itself. Does any have a source for these stiff sleeves?
I hope you mean the Ultra pro sleeves that are very commonly used nowadays for CCGs, as opposed to the stiffer sleeves which are usually used to protect sports or ccg cards long-term or in the mail. The former should be readily available at any game store, especially those that deal with Magic. The latter doesn't really shuffle at all and stacks of them get unreasonably thick.
As for backing with a magic or playing card- I recommend it. The Ultra Pro sleeves aren't really all that stiff on their own, and Magic cards are literally a dime a dozen- probably cheaper.
- Seth
I am printing 9 cards (3.5X2.5) on one page - what's the best way to cut them so they are exactly the same size?
thanks.
Using a rotary trimmer would probably be your best bet. Fiskars make a good one and it's available at most craft stores. The easiest method however would be to print them out on the perforated cards available from protoparts. The protoparts cards are only 6 to a page but if you can look beyond that then it would probably be a good solution for you.
-Darke
Definitely paper inserts in card sleeves is the way to go (whether or not you put in a playing card to stiffen the sleeve). I have done a game with more than 150 cards and more than a dozen iterations. Changes are fast and easy when you use paper (and MUCH cheaper than cardstock). The sleeves help give them a more professional feel (much better than using plain cardstock without the sleeves).